“Marketing and resi sales, there, I also would say still low to mid-single-digit growth for the full year.”

In context

“arketing were a little bit higher than anticipated. Jessica M. Fischer: Yes. So Sebastiano, the $45 million does fall all the way to the bottom line. There was a little bit of bad debt expense against it, I think, around $7 million. So maybe it's like $38 million that falls all the way down. We did point out there was this sort of unusual storm activity as well. I think when you factor those couple of things in, you end up pretty close to flat. From a cost to serve, and I guess if I just sort of go through the outlook for expense line items, it really hasn't changed. So cost to serve had a difficult comp inside of last year. If you look across the quarters last year, this is really the only quarter that suffers from that issue. So I think still flat to slightly down in the year-over-year. Marketing and resi sales, there, I also would say still low to mid-single-digit growth for the full year. We should have a much slower year-over-year growth rate in the back half of the year versus the front half. A good portion of that is that the comps are a bit easier in the back half of the year. And we also expect overall sales and marketing expense to subside slightly as we move later in the year because of the mix of our activities. And we think that we'll do that without impacting sort of overall marketing levels or effectiveness. And then in other, there, I would say also still in the low to mid-single digits, though as I've noted before, other because of what's inside of it can be a bit more volatile than some of the other expense items. Christopher L. Winfrey: The one thing I'd just step back on cost to serve when you think longer term, not just in the coming quarters, long term, c”