“I should also feel very comfortable with the outlook that was in the proxy statement for combined CapEx of the combined company. I feel pretty comfortable with the envelope that exists inside there as well.”

In context

“line dramatically over the next 4 years already. And that stand-alone expectation isn't diminished in any way by taking on the Cox assets. When you take on the Cox assets, you have more revenue. But actually, we have space to do what we need to from a transition capital perspective inside of still having a really nice decline in capital intensity over time. Christopher L. Winfrey: It's probably good an opportunity to highlight. I know there's been some questions or speculation. The Charter CapEx outlook, other than some timing between years that get pushed from one year to the other, investors can depend on what we've provided for the Charter CapEx. When we -- we don't typically do that, the fact that we did and we understood the importance and you can take that one literally to the bank. I should also feel very comfortable with the outlook that was in the proxy statement for combined CapEx of the combined company. I feel pretty comfortable with the envelope that exists inside there as well. And so the free cash flow generation that Jessica has spoken about at this point, we feel like it's pretty much math. And atypical for us, we wanted to make sure that it was provided out there and that people could depend on it. Operator: Your last question will come from Jim Schneider with Goldman Sachs. James Edward Schneider: I was wondering in light of some of the increased fiber investments you've seen from some of your competitors in the market, whether you're thinking any differently about your multiyear CapEx outlook, either in terms of the overall envelope or in terms of the composition? And specifically, maybe talk to the prospects for increased rural build investments and maybe using that as a source for the cash tax savings. Christopher L. Winfrey: The answer to your question,”