“We're currently further optimizing dose and formulation and hope to update you on that program in 2026.”

In context

“think he can come back in. Chris Boshoff: It is, okay. So you are correct. That is a STAT inhibitor. I want to point out that we currently have a very differentiated I&I portfolio with at least 5 molecules in-house discovered and developed, most of these at a significantly accelerated speed, including obviously p40/TL1a, which we co-developed or which is being co-developed with Roche, which covers IL-12 and IL-23 by p40. Our 2 tri-specifics covering IL-4, IL-13, TSLP or IL-33, both of those now entering Phase II for atopic dermatitis and for other Th2-related diseases. Litfulo with the ongoing and Phase III trial in nonsegmental vitiligo, which is a JAK3/TEC inhibitor, also differentiated in-house. And then the STAT6 early, just entering Phase II could be potentially first-in-class oral. We're currently further optimizing dose and formulation and hope to update you on that program in 2026. Albert Bourla: Thank you very much, next question please. Operator: We'll go next to Steve Scala with TD Cowen. Steve Scala: Two questions. What does the drug pricing deal with Trump allow Pfizer to do that other companies will not be able to do other than, of course, AstraZeneca? And secondly, on Metsera, so the data looks more similar than different than competitors and Metsera disclosures haven't been completely transparent, raising serious questions. Many other big cap pharmas have passed over Metsera when pursuing other products, validating the me-too point. Nothing in all this justifies a bidding war or even a protracted legal battle. Is Pfizer's determination to persist underpinned by substantial confidentiality data -- confidential data or simply the desire to be a player in obesi”