“We are guiding above 30%, at 31%, and we're doing this in a very, very complicated environment.”

In context

“y something we dared to call an ontology, which was in the beginning viewed as a highly obnoxious anti-chromatic team that people thought we were using to obfuscate bad financials. And that ontology and our willingness to stick to our guns, again, because there's been billions and billions and billions of dollars invested in large language models, the idea that you could dare to build a product that was built on the assumption that the power of large language models would be in their operas, the ability to operationalize them in the context of the enterprise in common language. So that was a revolution that we saw that we built against, that we've led, that we've got off the ground for us in America. We have 54% growth in U.S. Comm. We -- by the way, USG is now reaccelerated, it grew 30%. We are guiding above 30%, at 31%, and we're doing this in a very, very complicated environment. The part of the reason we've done so well is the experts look to the past as an indication of the future when we're looking to the future as an indication of the present, and it's very, very hard to figure out what's going to happen. We see as much as I personally care about the broader West, including Continental Europe, despite our best efforts and working on every day, it's anemic. We're growing around 4% on 13% of our company. It does look like the continent of Europe will look to the past as a way of getting to the future, struggles with the idea that all the valuable technology in this area is built in America. Perhaps struggles with the fact that to make LLMs work, you have to find a way to build something like an ontology. There's one available at Palantir. We have rejected all th”